This yield figure reflects the theoretical income that a portfolio would generate, including dividends and interest, during the period after deducting a fund’s expenses for the period. A fund’s actual net earnings for a given period under generally accepted accounting principles may differ from this standardized yield.
The annualized rate an investor would receive if the most recent fund distribution stayed the same going forward. This rate does not represent the total return of a fund. The distribution rate is calculated by annualizing the most recent distribution and dividing by a fund’s NAV from the as-of-date.
Weighted Average Yield to Maturity is the discount rate that calculates the present value of a bond’s anticipated cash flows with its market price (including accrued interest). A fund Average YTM is defined as the weighted average of a fund’s individual bond holding YTMs and is based upon Net Asset Value (“NAV”). This does not include fees and expenses.
Weighted Average Yield to Worst uses the lowest discount rate for all possible redemption date scenarios with its market price. A fund’s Average YTW is defined as the weighted average of a fund’s individual bond holding YTWs and is based upon the price of each individual bond that was utilized to calculate that day’s net asset value and does not include fund fees and expenses.
* Returns for Funds with performance less than a year are cumulative and are not annualized.
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and current performance may be lower or higher than the figures shown. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate with changes in market conditions and other factors so that an investor's shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
1 The expense ratio reflects the Fund's actual total annual operating expense ratio, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements as of its most recent prospectus.
2 There is a contractual fee waiver currently in place for this Fund to the extent necessary in keeping the Fund operating expense ratio from exceeding the figure shown of average net assets per year. (See the Fund's prospectus for end date of fee waiver.) Some expenses fall outside of this expense cap and actual expenses may be higher than the figure shown. Without this expense cap, actual returns would be lower.
3 The expense ratio is expressed as a unitary fee and covers all expenses of the Fund, except for the fee payments under the investment advisory agreement, distribution fees, if any, brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, litigation expenses and other extraordinary expenses.
4 The Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses associated with the underlying investment companies in which Guggenheim Funds ETFs may invest are not included in the operating expenses listed for such Funds. Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are based on each ETF's current portfolio and are subject to change. Please read each Fund's prospectus for more information.
5 Due to the Fund's recent inception, performance data is not yet available.
6 Prior to June 1, 2011, the Fund’s name was Claymore U.S. Capital Markets Bond ETF and the Fund sought to replicate an index called The Capital Markets Bond Index℠. Performance is based on a passively managed strategy and may vary under the actively managed strategy.
7 Prior to December 5, 2011, the Fund's name was Guggenheim Enhanced Ultra-Short Bond ETF. Prior to June 1, 2011, the Fund’s name was Claymore U.S. Capital Markets Micro-Term Fixed Income ETF and the Fund sought to replicate an index called The Capital Markets Liquidity Index℠. Performance is based on a passively managed strategy and may vary under the actively managed strategy.
8 On September 3, 2008, the Fund acquired the assets and adopted the financial and performance history of the Claymore/Raymond James SB-1 Equity Fund (the “RYJ Predecessor Fund”). The performance information prior to September 3, 2008, is based upon the performance and operating expenses of the RYJ Predecessor Fund. The inception date of the RYJ Predecessor Fund was May 19, 2006. The investment goals, strategies and policies of the Fund are substantially similar to those of the RYJ Predecessor Fund.
9 Prior to August 20, 2010, the Fund’s name was Claymore/Sabrient Stealth ETF and it sought to replicate an index called the Sabrient Stealth Index. The Performance information prior to August 20, 2010 is based upon the performance and operating expenses of the Claymore/Sabrient Stealth ETF.
10 Prior to March 31, 2009, the Fund’s name was the Claymore/Robeco Developed International Equity ETF and the Fund sought to replicate an index called the Robeco Developed International Equity Index. The Performance information prior to March 31, 2009 is based upon the performance and operating expenses of the Claymore/Robeco Developed International Equity ETF.
11 Prior to July 27, 2009, the Fund’s name was Claymore/Great Companies Large-Cap Growth Index ETF and the Fund sought to replicate an index called the Great Companies Large-Cap Growth Index. The Performance information prior to July 27, 2009 is based upon the performance and operating expenses of the Claymore/Great Companies Large-Cap Growth Index ETF.
12 Prior to July 27, 2011, the Fund sought to replicate an index called the Delta Global Shipping Index. The Performance information prior to July 27, 2011 is based upon the performance and operating expenses of the Delta Global Shipping Index.
After tax returns are calculated using the historical highest individual federal marginal income tax rates during the periods shown and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after tax returns depend on an investor's tax situation and may differ from those shown.
Since Inception returns assume a purchase of the ETF at the initial share price for share price returns or the initial net asset value (NAV) per share for NAV returns. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. Returns included a reinvestment of distribution. Investors should also be aware that these returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions and may not be sustainable.